Brittany Higgins rape trial updates: Jury deliberations to continue in Bruce Lehrmann rape trial

The jury will continue their deliberations today in the trial for Bruce Lehrmann, the man accused of raping Brittany Higgins at Parliament House.

The 26-year-old has pleaded not guilty to one count of sexual intercourse without consent.

The 12 person ACT Supreme Court jury began their deliberations on Wednesday afternoon, with the group returning to court at 10am today.

Chief Justice Lucy McCallum told the court yesterday that four jury members from the original 16-person panel would need to be removed ahead of deliberations.

Chief Justice McCallum said the larger group was needed initially to allow for instances where jury members may become sick or find themselves in a situation where they can no longer be part of the jury.

All their juror numbers were placed in a ballot box and four were picked out at random, with two men and two women being released from the court.

The jury now consists of eight women and four men.

When giving her final directions to the jury, Chief Justice McCallum said it is up to them to come to a joint decision.

She pointed out that it is the job of both the defence and prosecution “to persuade” and what they say about the evidence is “not in itself evidence”.

The onus is not on the accused to prove his innocence, instead it is for the prosecutor to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court heard.

This does not mean the prosecution has to prove the truth of every statement made by every witness beyond reasonable doubt, the judge said.

“Nor does it mean you have to find in favour of the prosecutor on each and every fact,” she said.

Chief Justice McCallum highlighted that the key three-word phrase they needed to consider was beyond reasonable doubt, not “beyond any doubt”.

The jury was also told they might consider the nature of human memory and whether some events might be imprinted on a person’s memory more than others.

As an example, Chief Justice McCallum said she certainly remembers “where I was the last time the Swans won the premiership.”

She told the jury they must not let “sympathy or prejudice” sway their judgment.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *